REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

The New Testament/Covenant replaced the Old Testament/Covenant for the Jew.

and…

the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: Ephesians 3:6.

– Scripture makes this clear.

Hebrews 8:

7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.

8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:

9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.

10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:

11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.

12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.

13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.

Hebrews 10:

9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.

10 By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

– The Gospel of Jesus Christ was to the Jew first

Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.

– Gentiles… without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise… made nigh by the blood of Christ

Ephesians 2

11 Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;

12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.

14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;

15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;

16 And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:

17 And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh.

18 For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father.

– The mystery is that the Gentiles should be fellowheirs.

Ephesians: 3:

1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles,

2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward:

3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words,

4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ)

5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit;

6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:

– the blessing of Abraham

Galatians 3:14 That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

– they are not all Israel, which are of Israel

– Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children

Romans 9:

1 I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost,

2 That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart.

3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:

4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;

5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.

6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:

7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.

– children of the promise are counted for the seed

Romans 9:8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.

– if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise

Galatians 3:29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Summary:

1. The Old Testament/Covenant was replaced with the New Testament/Covenant.

2. The New Testament/Covenant was to the Jew first.

3.  They are not all Israel, which are of Israel.

4.  Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children.

5. The promise is still available to the Jews, they have not been replaced, for the Scripture says… if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

6. The Gentiles, who were aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel.

6 thoughts on “REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

  1. Hi Cathy,

    Thank you so much for keep bringing this matter up on your blog. Today I have been greatly blessed by reading this post, and also delving more extensively into your list of related posts.

    I understand that you used to be very into the Dispensational false teachings, and I identify with you a little there. I have previously attending meetings by organisations that promoted such beliefs (eg with Thomas Ice & Paul Wilkinson). I think that in my case, it was mostly out of the sense of desperation I felt, due to the churches not providing anything more than milk and other false doctrines. I was just longing to meet with other Christians who might be wanting to actually THINK about matters pertaining to the Christian faith.

    However, I always knew the scriptures, that clearly stated that we are one body in Christ – no longer a division between Jew & Gentile. I managed to keep myself from becoming too involved with those who obsessed on the country of Israel. (I often found them quite dogmatic and intolerant of those who disagreed with them).

    In 2015 I wrote a lengthy letter to a fellowship I had been visiting for a couple of months, to explain why I could no longer meet with them. This is a segment of what I wrote in the introduction to them.

    “I have had some areas of concern that I will state here in the 2 main categories of:

    1. A possibly “over strong” interest in matters of Israel & Judaism that may lead to being “entangled back under some aspects of Judaic Law;” the very thing the Bible warns about in some of the New Testament letters, eg, Galatians.
    2. An acceptance of the teachings of Mr X, a “self-appointed prophet”.

    I do not wish to delve into the matter of Judaism/Israel in this letter, as it is not something I have done much study into currently …”

    You see, I knew they were off on a strange Jewish tangent (which I found most wearisome), but I had never read anything that put the scriptures together or taught on this subject. So, that is why I have been so delighted to finally find someone who does tell the real truth about what the Bible teaches on this subject.

    Thank you for all your hard work in encouraging the scattered flock.

    Much love to you,
    Helen

    Like

    • Hi Helen, Thank you for your informative and kind comment.

      The first church I went to as a new believer taught basic dispensational doctrines and I accepted what was taught for a time. What led me to reject dispensationalism entirely began when a relative started telling me that the words of Jesus, the four gospels, baptism, the Lord’s supper, the great commission, the new birth, and repentance were not for the “church age”. I was stunned. What was this! After much searching of God’s Word, studying, and unraveling, I found that it had a name, dispensationalism. What my relative believed is called hyper-dispensationalism, the extreme of dispensationalism, learned from a television preacher. There was no convincing that this was serious error.

      I commend you for writing a letter. It would be wonderful and maybe make a difference if more believers would do that. The sad truth is that many believers just accept what is taught in their churches.

      I have to say I find dispensational teaching to be a difficult maze to maneuver. Looking over some of my older posts I wonder how I ever was able to write anything on this topic. I thank the Lord for His Holy Spirit teaching me through his Word.

      Love and blessings to you Helen.

      When we all get to neaven what a day of rejoicing that will be!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. The tribulation is to bring the House of Israel back to the One True Savior, I believe. And the Jews in protection of God will see this truth.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s